
WEIGHT: 47 kg
Bust: 3
One HOUR:250$
NIGHT: +100$
Services: Gangbang / Orgy, Spanking, BDSM, Moresomes, Role playing
There were the dissenting justices, mostly arguing legalistically, and there were the assenting justices, arguing Executive authority and pragmatics, that China and storms are real threats and Executive must have the wherewithal to deal with them. If you enjoy legal debate and want to know EDCA inside out, the judicial opinions are well worth reading. They are also in Jurisprudence where they will rest, ammunition for law professors and students and future lawyers to use to bludgeon one another with words, both old and new.
Who got the best deal in the agreement, the US or Philippines? Both parties got what they need, if not what they wanted. The US wanted a 20 year agreement and got The US wanted full control of facilities; the Philippines got the right for the base commander to go anywhere at any time; they are Philippine bases.
People can argue the agreement terms, and will. Such arguments really define the person doing the argument more than anything. It is a cooperative agreement by two allies with a shared mutual interest. The discussions were forthright and earnest. Is the US providing hard support to Japan and soft support to the Philippines? Japan got a lot, the Philippines very little. These are not shoals and reefs. They are islands. They came into conflict only as late as in the s as China began her expansion and acquisition of resources.
Second, the US defense treaty with Japan is much more involved and evolved than the agreement with the Philippines because the partnership has been a working engagement, not confounded by the US being asked by the Japanese government to leave Japan. The US and Japan are partners, signed, sealed and delivered. The Philippine-American defense treaty, signed in , does not include specific mention of the disputed islands, shoals and reefs in the West Philippine Sea.
The document is not as robustly developed and speaks in general terms. So, in answer to the question posed, yes, the US is providing a firmer commitment to Japan than the Philippines, by virtue of a deeper, longer lasting partnership. Will the US fight, and under what circumstances? This question seeks certainty when there is none. Warmaking is a political process and it is civilian bosses who must make the decisions to shoot or not to shoot. They are seeking certainty and argue the EDCA relationship is flawed because no one will give them that certainly.