This analysis raises a ton of questions and concerns. Will Kigali get involved even if under the table? Are ethnic and historical beefs fading in favor of self interest? Did Western players have any idea what pushing for Bosco's arrest, using military means, could lead to? Is this tied to SSR? Because s displaced doesn't seem very secure. Is the U. Will there be any backlash against the general Tutsi population?
I had read a post that several Tutsi's were fleeing, though not confirmed. I am not optimistic about anybody's diplomatic abilities nowadays, but I certainly hope this tamps down somehow. I hate to said that " I told u so" to some people who were advocating the arrest of bosco without solving some prealable in the army.
I don't think the destruction of those networks are the main motive of the new rebellion. I think we are underestimating the fear factor those who rebelled must feel. There must be discipline in the army but in the same time you have to encourage defection not send ultimatum if u are not ready to back up your words.
How comes the fardc are always taken by surprise? Did cheka has commandos has well? As long that those who are corrupted will call the shots the fardc will fail. Thanks a lot Jason for this, there is a lot of confusion on official media around the problem and your post is great. A source state that Rwanda is supporting both Bosco and Cheka that allegedly is operating from Giseny?!?
Is it smoke in the eyes for covering support somewhere or eventually tu justify a new interventions? Does this mean that we are back to a cndp-related political problem rather than a cross-cutting justice and salary issue with cndp-pareco integrated units as it seemed at the beginning? If so should we expect again a situation similar to that of the failed peace of ? How far can go the eventual alliane Cheka-cndp-bosco-rwanda? Isn't dangerous for Kagame to repeat mistakes of and risk once again public charges that could fragilise his leadership at the eyes of the int.
