
WEIGHT: 60 kg
Bust: B
One HOUR:200$
NIGHT: +70$
Sex services: Massage Thai, Massage anti-stress, For family couples, Cum in mouth, Oral
Following dismissal briefing and oral argument, Judge William Alsup issued an opinion in the competition and conspiracy case brought by several adult entertainers on behalf of a similarly situated class against Meta Platforms and the operators of OnlyFans, an adult entertainment website. As previously covered by Law Street Media, the plaintiffs post links on social media to adult entertainment websites that allow users to watch their content for a price.
The plaintiffs profit through a revenue sharing agreement with website owners, who compete with rival service OnlyFans, the complaint says.
They further accuse the OnlyFans defendants of civil conspiracy. Among other allegations, Judge Alsup pointed to wire transfers from the OnlyFans defendants to Meta accounts and found it reasonable to infer that one money transfer, with its subject line listing adult entertainment websites that compete with OnlyFans, was a bribe to Meta employees.
The court also highlighted a graph showing that in late , competitors of OnlyFans experienced significant drops in web traffic while OnlyFans experienced a significant increase. In declining the argument, Judge Alsup pointed to Supreme Court precedent holding that the First Amendment does not immunize anticompetitive conduct. Law Street Media Legal news that leads to business.
Tech Tech Giants. December 5, Keep In Touch. Subscribe Contact. Go to mobile version.